<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Running HSRP for Availability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aconaway.com/2007/08/21/running-hsrp-for-availability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aconaway.com/2007/08/21/running-hsrp-for-availability/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s possible that someone somewhere needs to see this.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:03:12 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Conaway</title>
		<link>http://aconaway.com/2007/08/21/running-hsrp-for-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-75299</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Conaway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconaway.com/2007/08/21/running-hsrp-for-availability/#comment-75299</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right, William.  The machines on the local LAN use the HSRP VIP (10.1.1.1 in this case) as their gateway.  If the active router then fails, that gateway IP will move to the other router, and the machines won&#039;t know the difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right, William.  The machines on the local LAN use the HSRP VIP (10.1.1.1 in this case) as their gateway.  If the active router then fails, that gateway IP will move to the other router, and the machines won&#8217;t know the difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://aconaway.com/2007/08/21/running-hsrp-for-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-75165</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconaway.com/2007/08/21/running-hsrp-for-availability/#comment-75165</guid>
		<description>A quesiton, I &#039;d happy to know, which will be the default gateway on PC. 10.1.1.1 ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A quesiton, I &#8216;d happy to know, which will be the default gateway on PC. 10.1.1.1 ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Conaway</title>
		<link>http://aconaway.com/2007/08/21/running-hsrp-for-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-4511</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Conaway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconaway.com/2007/08/21/running-hsrp-for-availability/#comment-4511</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Absolutely right, Chris.  That was a horrible, horrible mistake on my part.  I blame my coworkers and my ADD.  Corrected.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely right, Chris.  That was a horrible, horrible mistake on my part.  I blame my coworkers and my ADD.  Corrected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://aconaway.com/2007/08/21/running-hsrp-for-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-4510</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconaway.com/2007/08/21/running-hsrp-for-availability/#comment-4510</guid>
		<description>Your saying in HSRP that he LOWER priority is the active router and the higher priority is the standby... ? I don&#039;t think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your saying in HSRP that he LOWER priority is the active router and the higher priority is the standby&#8230; ? I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron&#8217;s Worthless Words &#187; Object Tracking and HSRP</title>
		<link>http://aconaway.com/2007/08/21/running-hsrp-for-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron&#8217;s Worthless Words &#187; Object Tracking and HSRP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconaway.com/2007/08/21/running-hsrp-for-availability/#comment-439</guid>
		<description>[...] number of 100 that tracks the line protocol of interface S0/0. Now what? If we look back to the HSRP setup we have, two routers with HSRP running on each of the FastEthernets. If we add an interface S0/0 for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] number of 100 that tracks the line protocol of interface S0/0. Now what? If we look back to the HSRP setup we have, two routers with HSRP running on each of the FastEthernets. If we add an interface S0/0 for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

